Friday, May 13, 2016

How God Prepared Moses in the Palace, Midian and the Wilderness

Article Summary

This personal Bible reflection explores how God prepared Moses through three distinct seasons: his early life in Egypt, forty years in Midian and forty years leading Israel through the wilderness. It also considers what Moses may have learned in a priestly household while carefully separating what Scripture states from devotional interpretation.

Reflection first recorded: Friday, 13 May 2016

This meditation began after I read United Christian Broadcasters’ devotional Leave Your Comfort Zone (1). That message focused on Moses leaving comfort and security to obey God. As I reflected further, another pattern stood out to me: God had been preparing Moses through every major season of his life.

“I will lead them in paths they have not known. I will make darkness light before them.”

Moses could not fulfil God’s call while clinging to the identity, status and security of Pharaoh’s household. Hebrews tells us that, by faith, he refused to be known merely as the son of Pharaoh’s daughter and chose to identify with God’s people (Hebrews 11:24–27).

Yet leaving Egypt did not mean Moses was immediately ready to lead Israel. Between the palace and the Exodus came Midian: marriage, family life, shepherding, obscurity and the wilderness. What appeared to be a long detour became part of his preparation.

Three Forty-Year Seasons in the Life of Moses

Stephen’s speech in Acts 7 helps us see a striking pattern. Moses was about forty when he visited the children of Israel; another forty years passed before God called him at the burning bush; and Moses then led Israel during forty years in the wilderness. Exodus says he was eighty when he stood before Pharaoh, and Deuteronomy records that he died at 120.

Life season Setting What Scripture states Possible preparation
First forty years
Birth to about age 40
Egypt and Pharaoh’s household Moses was raised by Pharaoh’s daughter and became learned in the wisdom of the Egyptians. Exposure to language, administration, public life and the workings of a powerful nation.
Second forty years
About age 40 to 80
Midian and the wilderness Moses settled in Midian, married Zipporah, had children and tended Jethro’s flock. Shepherding, patience, desert knowledge, family responsibility, humility and dependence on God.
Third forty years
About age 80 to 120
Egypt, Sinai and the wilderness journey God sent Moses to confront Pharaoh, lead Israel out of Egypt and guide the people through the wilderness. Earlier experiences were brought together in a calling that still required daily obedience and God’s presence.

The “possible preparation” column is devotional interpretation. Scripture gives the events, settings and timing, but it does not provide a detailed list of every skill Moses learned in each season.

First Formation: Moses in the Palace

“And Moses was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and was mighty in words and deeds.”

My first thought was that God allowed Moses to see first-hand how a nation functioned. He grew up close to royal power and was educated in Egyptian wisdom. This does not mean Scripture tells us the exact subjects he studied or formally says he was “trained to rule Israel.” Nevertheless, it is reasonable to recognise that his upbringing exposed him to a world of leadership, authority, communication and national affairs.

There is also a warning in this part of his story. Knowledge and position were not enough. At about forty, Moses tried to defend an oppressed Hebrew and killed an Egyptian. He may have understood something of Israel’s need, but he was not yet commissioned to deliver the nation in his own strength. His palace formation had value, but it could not replace God’s timing or God’s way.

Second Formation: Moses in Midian

“Now Moses was tending the flock of Jethro his father-in-law, the priest of Midian.”

Moses went from Pharaoh’s household to tending sheep. To human eyes, that could look like a fall in status. Yet shepherding required watchfulness, patience, endurance and responsibility for vulnerable lives. The wilderness also became familiar ground.

Later, Moses would lead an entire people through a wilderness for forty years. He would face thirst, hunger, uncertainty, conflict and repeated complaints. His years in Midian did not make that task easy, but they meant the desert was no longer completely unknown to him.

This is the part of the story that speaks most strongly to me: the length of Moses’ hidden season matched the length of his later wilderness leadership. He spent forty years living in Midian before spending forty years guiding Israel in the wilderness (Acts 7:29–36). What may have felt like delay was not necessarily wasted time.

✨ Deep Treasure

God did not begin preparing Moses at the burning bush. The palace, the exile, the family years, the flock and the wilderness all came before the public assignment. A season that looks unrelated to our calling may still be forming the patience, understanding or endurance that the calling will require.

Reuel, Jethro and a Priestly Household

Another detail caught my attention. Exodus 2:18 names Reuel as the father of the seven daughters, including the woman Moses later married. Exodus 3:1 calls Moses’ father-in-law Jethro, the priest of Midian. A Bible encyclopaedia explains Reuel/Jethro as double names and gives the meaning of Reuel as “friend” or “companion of God.”

It is meaningful that Moses lived within the household of a priest of Midian. He later stood before Israel as God’s appointed leader and covenant mediator. He received God’s instructions for worship and carried out the consecration of Aaron and his sons.

An important biblical distinction

Scripture does not say that Reuel or Jethro trained Moses in the priesthood that God later established for Israel. It also does not identify Moses as Israel’s high priest. God appointed Aaron and Aaron’s sons to serve as priests (Exodus 28:1–3), while Moses served in his unique role as prophet, leader and mediator. Moses then consecrated Aaron and his sons according to God’s command (Leviticus 8:1–13).

Therefore, living in a priestly household may have given Moses some exposure to religious leadership, but that remains a thoughtful possibility rather than an explicit statement of Scripture.

Prepared, Yet Still Dependent on God

Even after all those years of life experience, Moses did not feel ready. At the burning bush, he asked:

  • Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh?
  • What shall I say when Israel asks who sent me?
  • What if they do not believe me?
  • How can I speak when I am slow of speech?
  • Could God send someone else?

These questions in Exodus 3:11–4:17 show that preparation does not always feel like confidence. Moses still needed God’s presence, God’s words, God’s signs and the support of Aaron. His calling was not the reward for becoming self-sufficient. It required him to trust the One who called him.

At eighty years old, Moses returned to face Pharaoh (Exodus 7:6–7). He left the security of his Midian life, but he did not go alone. God promised to be with him.

What Moses’ Preparation Teaches Me

  1. God can use more than one kind of training. Formal learning, ordinary work, family responsibility and difficult seasons may each form something different in us.
  2. A hidden season is not automatically a wasted season. Moses’ shepherding years looked far removed from national leadership, yet the wilderness later became the setting of his service.
  3. Earlier failure does not have to be the end of the calling. Moses’ first attempt to intervene in Egypt went terribly wrong, but God later sent him back under divine instruction.
  4. Preparation does not remove the need for dependence. Moses’ background could not deliver Israel; God did.
  5. Obedience may require leaving a new comfort zone. Moses first left Egypt as a fugitive, but decades later he had to leave the settled life he had built in Midian and return.

Questions for Personal Reflection

  1. Is there a past season I have dismissed as wasted, even though God may still use what I learned there?
  2. Am I relying on experience alone, or am I still depending on God’s presence and direction?
  3. Has a place of obscurity been developing patience, courage or compassion in me?
  4. Is God asking me to leave a familiar form of comfort or security in order to obey Him?
  5. What is the next faithful step I can take without needing to know every future detail?

Prayer

Lord, thank You that no season surrendered to You has to be wasted. Help me recognise what You have been teaching me through places of learning, waiting, work, family responsibility and wilderness. Keep me from trusting only in my own experience, and give me courage to obey when You lead me along an unfamiliar path. Form in me the humility, patience and faith needed for the work You have prepared. In Jesus’ name, amen.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Moses spend forty years in Midian?

Acts 7 places Moses at about forty when he visited his fellow Israelites and says another forty years passed before the burning-bush encounter. Exodus 7:7 then records that Moses was eighty when he and Aaron spoke to Pharaoh.

Was Moses Israel’s high priest?

No. Moses was Israel’s prophet, leader and covenant mediator. Aaron and his sons were appointed to the priesthood, and Aaron served as high priest. Moses did, however, consecrate Aaron and his sons according to God’s instructions.

Are Reuel and Jethro the same person?

Exodus 2 uses the name Reuel in the family account, while Exodus 3 calls Moses’ father-in-law Jethro. Many biblical reference works understand Reuel and Jethro as double names for the priest of Midian, although the family terminology has also been discussed by interpreters.

References and Further Reading

Topics Covered: Moses, palace preparation, Midian, wilderness training, forty-year seasons, Reuel, Jethro, Aaron, priesthood, obedience, comfort zones, spiritual preparation

Thursday, May 12, 2016

Responding in a Christlike Way: Loving Enemies Without Excusing Harm

Article Summary

This personal reflection considers Jesus’ command to love our enemies, pray for those who hurt us and refuse personal revenge. It also explains why Christlike love can include truthful confrontation, wise boundaries, reporting wrongdoing and moving to safety.

Reflection first recorded: Thursday, 12 May 2016

This meditation began after I read Respond in a Christlike Way from The Word for Today. The devotional drew from Matthew 5:38–48 and challenged readers to answer mistreatment according to the teaching of Jesus rather than the desire for revenge. What follows is my expanded personal reflection on that lesson.

“But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you.”

The Command That Exposed My Heart

My first response in 2016 was very honest: it is so hard to respond in a Christlike way. How do I love someone who has hurt me? How can I pray for an enemy when everything in me wants to defend myself, answer back or create distance?

Jesus’ teaching in the Sermon on the Mount confronts the instinct to repay injury with injury. He speaks of turning the other cheek, going the second mile, giving generously and loving enemies. The common thread is not weakness or pretending that evil is good. It is the refusal to let another person’s wrongdoing decide the condition of my heart or turn me into someone who returns the same evil.

My original prayerful question

How can I turn the other cheek, go the extra mile and love my enemies when I feel hurt? Lord, help me in those moments. Teach me to reflect Your character instead of reacting from anger, fear or revenge.

What Does “Turn the Other Cheek” Mean?

Jesus was teaching His followers not to take personal revenge. When insulted, humiliated or wronged, a disciple does not have to copy the offender’s conduct. We can interrupt the cycle of retaliation and entrust final justice to God.

This does not mean that harm should be ignored. Jesus Himself calmly named wrongdoing when an officer struck Him: “If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil; but if well, why do you strike Me?” (John 18:22–23, NKJV). He did not retaliate, but neither did He call the blow acceptable.

Christlike love can include Christlike love does not require
Praying for the person and refusing revenge Pretending that harmful behaviour is harmless
Speaking truth calmly and honestly Remaining silent about abuse, threats or crime
Showing kindness when it is safe and wise Forced friendship, emotional closeness or unrestricted access
Forgiving and surrendering personal vengeance to God Immediate trust or freedom from appropriate consequences
Seeking peace as far as it depends on us Taking responsibility for another person’s refusal to live peacefully
Moving away, seeking help or reporting wrongdoing Staying in danger to prove that our faith is genuine

Loving an Enemy Is Not the Same as Trusting an Enemy

In my first reflection, I described loving enemies as “being friendly with them.” Kindness and courtesy may certainly express love. Yet Jesus’ command goes deeper than friendliness, and it does not mean that every relationship must become close.

Biblical love seeks another person’s true good. Sometimes that may look like generosity, patience or a gentle answer. At other times, love may require a truthful boundary, a firm “no,” distance from continuing harm or allowing legitimate authorities to address wrongdoing. Trust is relational and can be damaged. Reconciliation normally requires truth, repentance and a willingness from both people to pursue peace.

Paul expresses the balance carefully: “If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men” (Romans 12:18, NKJV). I am responsible for my response, but I cannot force another person to become safe, truthful or peaceful.

Love never requires remaining in danger

Jesus’ words must never be used to pressure a person to endure violence or abuse. Moving to safety, telling a trusted person, contacting a support service, preserving evidence or reporting a crime can be wise and loving actions. Jesus told His disciples that when persecution arose in one city, they could flee to another (Matthew 10:23).

In Australia, anyone in immediate danger should call 000. The national 1800RESPECT safety-planning service is available 24 hours a day by calling 1800 737 732 or texting 0458 737 732.

How Can I Respond in a Christlike Way?

  1. Pause before reacting. Anger may signal that something is wrong, but it does not need to choose my words or actions.
  2. Pray honestly. I can tell God about the hurt and ask Him to guard me from hatred, vengeance and bitterness.
  3. Name wrong as wrong. Love does not depend on denial. I can speak truth without humiliating or threatening the other person.
  4. Refuse to repay evil with evil. I do not have to insult because I was insulted, deceive because I was deceived or injure because I was injured.
  5. Choose the wise form of love. Depending on the situation, this may be prayer, practical kindness, silence, a difficult conversation, a boundary, distance or seeking help.
  6. Protect life and safety. If there is violence, abuse, stalking or a threat, I can move to safety and involve trusted people, professionals or authorities.
  7. Entrust justice to God. Refusing personal revenge does not erase justice; it means I do not appoint myself as the one who must repay harm with harm.

“Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.”

What Does It Mean to Be Perfect?

Jesus closes this part of the sermon with the words, “Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect” (Matthew 5:48, NKJV).

In this context, Jesus points to the Father’s complete and impartial love: God sends sunlight and rain upon both the just and the unjust. This does not mean that one loving response makes me sinlessly perfect or earns my place as God’s child. It calls me toward spiritual maturity—a love that is not reserved only for people who love me first.

I cannot produce that kind of love merely by forcing myself to feel friendly. I need the Holy Spirit to form love, patience, kindness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control in me (Galatians 5:22–23).

✨ Deep Treasure

Turning the other cheek does not mean offering evil another opportunity to wound us. It means refusing to let evil reproduce itself through us. Christlike love can pray, speak truth, establish boundaries, seek safety and pursue justice without becoming revengeful. The victory is not pretending that nothing happened; it is refusing to be overcome by what happened.

Questions for Personal Reflection

  • When I am hurt, do I seek a wise response or an opportunity to make the other person hurt too?
  • Is there someone I need to pray for even though trust cannot presently be restored?
  • Have I confused forgiveness with allowing unrestricted access to my life?
  • Can I name wrongdoing truthfully without hatred or humiliation?
  • Is there a situation in which I need support, a safety plan or a stronger boundary?
  • What would overcoming evil with good look like in this particular situation?
Prayer

Lord Jesus, help me when I am mistreated. Keep me from returning evil for evil, and teach me to love and pray as You commanded. Give me wisdom to know when to speak, when to remain silent, when to show kindness and when to step away. Help me establish boundaries without hatred, seek safety without shame and trust You with justice. Form Your love, courage and self-control in me so that evil does not overcome my heart. In Jesus’ name, amen.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does “turn the other cheek” mean a Christian must stay in an abusive situation?

No. Jesus forbids personal retaliation; He does not command a person to remain available for repeated violence or abuse. Seeking safety, support and lawful protection is not the same as taking revenge.

Must I be friends with someone in order to love them?

No. We can pray for a person, refuse vengeance and desire repentance and good for them without maintaining a close friendship. Love and wise distance can exist together.

Does forgiveness automatically restore trust?

No. Forgiveness releases personal vengeance, but trust concerns whether a relationship is safe and truthful. Damaged trust may require repentance, changed behaviour, accountability and time before it can be rebuilt.

Can Christians report wrongdoing?

Yes. Calmly reporting abuse, threats or crime to appropriate authorities can protect both the person harmed and others. Justice pursued through proper channels is different from personal retaliation.

References and Further Reading

Topics Covered: responding in a Christlike way, loving enemies, Matthew 5, turning the other cheek, going the second mile, prayer for enemies, non-retaliation, forgiveness, trust, Christian boundaries, abuse and safety, Romans 12, spiritual maturity

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

A Dream of the NOTORIOUS University Program: Discernment, Family and Preparation

Article Summary

In this personal dream record, I was at my university exploring an advanced computer program called “NOTORIOUS.” A formally dressed council member praised my talent but could not explain what he saw in me. After leaving, I passed a busy post office, met my Pop, Richard Tofinga, and was asked whether I was going to buy the uniform. This post preserves the dream and considers possible themes of discernment, reputation, communication, family and preparation without claiming one certain interpretation.

A personal dream record—not an allegation

The people, institution and computer program described below appeared within a dream. This record does not claim that a real university has a program named NOTORIOUS or that any university, council member or computer system is involved in hidden wrongdoing. The reflections that follow are possibilities, not predictions or statements of fact.

The word NOTORIOUS representing the university computer program seen in the dream
The image I originally used to represent the word “NOTORIOUS” in this dream record.

The Dream as I Remember It

This is the part of the dream I can recall.

I was at what felt like the university where I was studying at the time.

I was in an office or some kind of room, looking at the university’s new computer program called NOTORIOUS. It had a bluish icon that I clicked to enter, and the program seemed like technology from out of this world.

I saw one of the council members. He had a slim build and wore formal black attire. He commended me and said that I was very talented.

I looked at him with the sense that he was trying to suck up to me, so I asked him what talents he saw in me. I waited for an answer and, as I expected, he did not know what to say.

I knew that his words were only for show, so I went out through the front door.

As I made my way past the post office toward my right, I saw many people lining up to post things. Then I saw my Pop, Richard Tofinga, standing in the middle of the line.

I waved to him happily. He saw me and asked whether I was going to buy the uniform.

That is where the dream ended, and I woke up.

My First Thoughts After Waking

My immediate thought was that perhaps I was supposed to buy Isabella her new winter uniform. I was less certain about the meaning of the NOTORIOUS program at the university.

I wondered whether the name might carry a negative meaning—perhaps suggesting that something notorious had been hidden within a university program. I also wondered whether it could mean that the university would become well known because of an unusual computer program.

Those were my original questions, not conclusions. In ordinary English, notorious usually describes someone or something widely known for a bad reason. That negative association explains why the name stood out to me, but a word appearing in a dream is not evidence of misconduct in waking life.

Testing the Dream With Humility

Scripture encourages discernment rather than an immediate acceptance or rejection of every spiritual impression. The wise response is to retain what was actually seen, pray for understanding, compare possible interpretations with Scripture and avoid making claims that the dream itself cannot establish.

“Test all things; hold fast what is good.”

Testing this dream means distinguishing the details I remember from the explanations I considered afterward. It also means allowing an ordinary practical meaning—such as remembering Isabella’s winter uniform—to remain possible alongside deeper symbolic reflections.

Possible Meanings Within the Dream

The following interpretations are possibilities rather than a fixed decoding system. Dream symbols are personal and contextual; colours, people and places do not carry one universal meaning.

Dream detail Possible reflection What should remain open
The university setting A season of learning, development, testing or preparation for future responsibility. The setting does not prove that the dream concerns a real event at the university.
The advanced program called NOTORIOUS Questions about reputation, powerful systems, unexpected knowledge or something impressive that still requires examination. The name may have been symbolic, a memorable word or part of ordinary dream imagery. It does not reveal a real hidden program.
The bluish icon Blue may personally suggest communication, thought, calmness or authority, especially because the icon opened access to information. Scripture does not assign one universal meaning to a blue computer icon.
The formally dressed council member Institutional recognition, status or the appearance of authority. Formal black clothing is ordinary attire and should not automatically be interpreted as evil.
Praise without an explanation A lesson in distinguishing sincere recognition from empty flattery. Instead of accepting impressive words, I asked for substance. The dream figure does not establish the motives of any real council member.
The busy post office Messages, communication, things being sent, or people waiting for something to be received. It does not necessarily predict a literal letter, parcel or announcement.
My Pop, Richard Tofinga Family connection, affection, familiarity or a personally meaningful voice appearing amid a busy public setting. Only my relationship and memories can supply the personal significance of seeing Pop.
The question about buying the uniform A practical reminder about Isabella’s winter uniform, or a broader image of preparation, identity, belonging and readiness for a new season. The immediate practical meaning may be sufficient; a more symbolic meaning should not be forced.

Discernment Between Praise and Flattery

One of the clearest moments in the dream was not the technology but my response to praise. The council figure called me talented, yet when I asked which talents he recognised, he could not answer. The compliment sounded valuable until it was tested.

Proverbs 29:5 warns about the danger of flattery. This does not mean every compliment should be distrusted. Sincere encouragement can name what it has observed, whereas flattery often seeks influence without offering truth. The dream may reflect a desire to be known honestly rather than praised vaguely.

✨ Deep Treasure

The dream moves from impressive technology and polished praise toward a much simpler family question: “Are you going to buy the uniform?” Perhaps the contrast matters. What looks important is not always substantial, while a quiet practical responsibility may carry the clearest instruction. Discernment asks for truth beneath appearances and remains attentive to the ordinary duty already in front of me.

Three Themes I Can Carry Forward

  • Test recognition: appreciate encouragement, but value truthful and specific words above empty praise.
  • Pay attention to communication: the program and post office both involve information being accessed, sent or received.
  • Do the practical thing: before searching for a dramatic hidden meaning, consider whether the dream has brought an ordinary responsibility back to mind.

Questions for Reflection

  • Why did the program seem so advanced, and what feeling did it produce—wonder, concern, curiosity or caution?
  • Why was I unwilling to accept praise that the speaker could not explain?
  • What personal memories or qualities do I associate with my Pop, Richard Tofinga?
  • Was the uniform simply a practical reminder, or did it also suggest preparation and belonging?
  • Do the program and post office share a theme of messages, knowledge or communication?
  • Does any proposed interpretation produce humility, wisdom and responsible action rather than suspicion or fear?

A Prayer for Understanding

Prayer

LORD, if it is Your will, please help me understand this dream. Give me wisdom to recognise what is useful, humility not to force a meaning and discernment to separate truth from assumption. Help me attend faithfully to any practical responsibility You have placed before me. Let it be so, in Jesus’ name. Amen.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the name NOTORIOUS reveal wrongdoing at a real university?

No. The name appeared in a dream. Its ordinary negative meaning may help explain the concern I felt, but it is not evidence about any real institution, employee or computer system.

Could the uniform have been a simple reminder?

Yes. My first association was Isabella’s new winter uniform, and that practical interpretation should not be overlooked. If the uniform also carried a symbolic meaning, preparation, identity and belonging are reasonable possibilities rather than certainties.

How can a Christian approach a personal dream?

Record it honestly, pray for wisdom, test interpretations against Scripture, consider ordinary personal concerns and avoid making accusations or predictions that the dream cannot prove. James 1:5 encourages believers to ask God for wisdom.

References

Topics Covered: NOTORIOUS university program dream, personal dream record, Christian dream discernment, university technology, reputation and notoriety, praise and flattery, Proverbs 29:5, post office symbolism, Richard Tofinga, family memories, Isabella’s winter uniform, preparation, identity, communication and 1 Thessalonians 5:21.

Visitors